Thursday, March 18, 2010

Bernanke Wants to Eliminate Reserve Requirements Completely


Up until now, the United States has operated under a "fractional reserve" banking system.  Banks have always been required to keep a small fraction of the money deposited with them for a reserve, but were allowed to loan out the rest.  But now it turns out that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke wants to completely eliminate minimum reserve requirements, which he says "impose costs and distortions on the banking system". At least that is what a footnote to his testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services on February 10th says. So is Bernanke actually proposing that banks should be allowed to have no reserves at all?
That simply does not make any sense. But it is right there in black and white on the Federal Reserve's own website....
The Federal Reserve believes it is possible that, ultimately, its operating framework will allow the elimination of minimum reserve requirements, which impose costs and distortions on the banking system.
If there were no minimum reserve requirements, what kind of chaos would that lead to in our financial system?  Not that we are operating with sound money now, but is the solution to have no restrictions at all?  Of course not.
What in the world is Bernanke thinking?


(snippet)

"The Federal Reserve in collaboration with the giant banks has created the greatest financial crisis the world has ever seen. The foolish notion that unlimited amounts of money and credit created out of thin air can provide sustainable economic growth has delivered this crisis to us. Instead of economic growth and stable prices, (The Fed) has given us a system of government and finance that now threatens the world financial and political institutions. Pursuing the same policy of excessive spending, debt expansion and monetary inflation can only compound the problems that prevent the required corrections. Doubling the money supply didn’t work, quadrupling it won’t work either. Buying up the bad debt of privileged institutions and dumping worthless assets on the American people is morally wrong and economically futile."
The truth is that the financial system that we have created makes inflation inevitable.  The U.S. dollar has lost more than 95 percent of the value that it had when the Federal Reserve was created.  During this decade the value of the dollar will decline a whole lot more.
That doesn't sound like a very good investment.

4 comments:

  1. And if you thought subprime was bad...

    ReplyDelete
  2. 5:43,

    Settle down Jewman, because the solution is to have no banks at all and just one single nationally-owned treasury, where everybody keeps his digital money in one or more accounts. Loans are issued without usury and personal loans are restricted to a set amount, regardless of social standing, say $150,000, inclusive of credit cards, mortgage, car loan, etc.

    I'd like to see you Jews pump up real estate to the point where the common man can't afford it if people can't borrow more than $150,000 at no usury. Give people a proper minimum living wage, and before long, you have economic paradise.

    Last and certainly not least, the Jewish Messiah is indeed coming and will take care of your sorry ass.

    I win.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tell me why... someone lives next door or down the street from Benny B, why has he not been killed yet?

    The sooner the better.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Re: “The truth is that the financial system that we have created makes inflation inevitable”.

    How low could the stated value of “Federal” Reserve notes become, with respect to copper and nickel, before the 1946-2009 nickels, composed of 75% copper and 25% nickel, completely disappear from circulation?

    According to the “United States Circulating Coinage Intrinsic Value Table”, available at http://coinflation.com , the March 19th metal value, of these nickels, is “$0.0556339” or 111.26% of face value.

    ReplyDelete

Everyone is encouraged to participate with civilized comments.