Monday, March 30, 2009

Banks walking away from foreclosed homes and GO TO JAIL if you don't pay "your" DEBTS!


SOUTH BEND, Ind. — Mercy James thought she had lost her rental property here to foreclosure. A date for a sheriff’s sale had been set, and notices about the foreclosure process were piling up in her mailbox.
Ms. James had the tenants move out, and soon her white house at the corner of Thomas and Maple Streets fell into the hands of looters and vandals, and then, into disrepair. Dejected and broke, Ms. James said she salvaged but a lesson from her loss.

So imagine her surprise when the City of South Bend contacted her recently, demanding that she resume maintenance on the property. The sheriff’s sale had been canceled at the last minute, leaving the property title — and a world of trouble — in her name.

“I thought, ‘What kind of game is this?’ ” Ms. James, 41, said while picking at trash at the house, now so worthless the city plans to demolish it — another bill for which she will be liable.

City officials and housing advocates here and in cities as varied as Buffalo, Kansas City, Mo., and Jacksonville, Fla., say they are seeing an unsettling development: Banks are quietly declining to take possession of properties at the end of the foreclosure process, most often because the cost of the ordeal — from legal fees to maintenance — exceeds the diminishing value of the real estate.

The so-called bank walkaways rarely mean relief for the property owners, caught unaware months after the fact, and often mean additional financial burdens and bureaucratic headaches. Technically, they still owe on the mortgage, but as a practicality, rarely would a mortgage holder receive any more payments on the loan. The way mortgages are bundled and resold, it can be enormously time-consuming just trying to determine what company holds the loan on a property thought to be in foreclosure.

In Ms. James’s case, the company that was most recently servicing her loan is now defunct. Its parent company filed for bankruptcy and dissolved. And the original bank that sold her the loan said it could not find a record of it.

“It is what some of us think is the next wave of the crisis,” said Kermit Lind, a clinical professor at the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law and an expert on foreclosure law.

For older industrial cities like South Bend, hard times in the mortgage market began before the recent national downturn, as did the problem of bank walkaways. In the case of Ms. James, a home health care administrator, the foreclosure proceedings began in the summer of 2007, when she could not keep up with the adjustable rate on her mortgage.

In Buffalo, where officials said the problem had reached “epidemic” proportions in recent months, the city sued 37 banks last year, claiming they were responsible for the deterioration of at least 57 abandoned homes; the city chose a sampling of houses to include in the lawsuit, even though the banks had walked away from many more foreclosures. So far, five banks have settled.
Link
Woman Sentenced to Jail for Sons Crime?
by ACLU of Michigan
Mon Mar 30, 2009 at 09:22:05 AM PDT

The American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan asked for an emergency hearing today on behalf of an Escanaba woman sentenced to 30 days in jail because she is too poor to reimburse the court for her son’s stay in a juvenile detention facility.

"Like many people in these desperate economic times, Ms. Nowlin was laid off from work, lost her home and is destitute," said Michael J. Steinberg, ACLU of Michigan Legal Director. "Jailing her because of her poverty is not only unconstitutional, it’s unconscionable and a shameful waste of resources. It is not a crime to be poor in this country and the government must stop resurrecting debtor’s prisons from the dustbin of history."

5 comments:

  1. This paperwork boondoggle will prove to be salvation for troubled homeowners. The mortgage foreclosure process is grinding to a halt. They are apparently unable to decipher lawful ownership on foreclosed property because of the endless trail of resold mortgage paper. The banks will soon realize that current owners and occupants are the only chance to salvage any money from the situation. In other words, keep people in the homes and accept any payments rather than zero payments and destruction of the property resulting in a total loss.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Now, since the homeowners lost their house and the banks don't want it, the city doesn't want it, the government is now stuck with the paper. They will then own all the homes that have a mortgage. WELCOME to "END GAME" and the new socialist government... it has arrived.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Looks like some real nice places to live. Kansas City,Buffalo,South Bend,Jacksonville.
    probably real good neighborhoods,low crime rates etc,

    LULZ

    ReplyDelete
  4. If banks refuse to take houses, they should be forced to give back the last sale price in TARP funds

    ReplyDelete

Everyone is encouraged to participate with civilized comments.