Sunday, June 6, 2010

Bankers Insane Ideology To Screw The Public

(snippet)
Let's start with the worst news—blame for bad loans. Despite all of the stories proliferated about fraud (80 percent of which is committed by lenders, according to the FBI) and other forms of banker abuse, a full 53 percent of Americans believe that borrowers are responsible for taking out unaffordable loans, not the lenders who push the loans. This simply does not make sense. Let's imagine the best-case scenario for the lender, in which both the borrower and the lender have an educated, sober view of housing options, and nobody is being defrauded. This view is essentially presented by J.P. Morgan Chase Chief Economist James Glassman in a recent note to clients:

Folks may like to hear that someone else is to blame for the mistakes they made, but everyone knows--including those who bought houses far beyond what they could afford and then walked . . . that Wall Street isn't the only culprit in the housing debacle. 
Glassman's best defense of the banks is, in essence, that it takes two to tango. But unlike the borrower, the banker is supposed to be a professional—it's the banker's job to make sure that he isn't extending loans that cannot be repaid, and he gets paid very well to exercise this judgment. Personal responsibility is all well and good, but it's absurd to argue that it only extends to one party in a transaction—especially the party who isn't getting paid.

This belief that personal responsibility does not extend to bankers creates an unfair and irrational moral burden on borrowers who find themselves in over their heads. A full 80 percent of the general population believes that it is not acceptable for a borrower to stop paying his or her mortgage, even under conditions of financial distress. Even more astonishing, 61 percent of borrowers who have already missed payments on their mortgage believe the same thing.

Bankers intentionally propagate this insane ideology in order to profit from it. That's why high-ranking people like Glassman publish "research notes" castigating his bank's own customers. The Wall Street bonus machine feeds on irrational borrower guilt. If you're stuck in a mortgage you can't afford, refusing to pay is your only real defense against that machine.

14 comments:

  1. its a simple business decision. why keep paying for something that the equity can never be recovered from?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Do not the Banks use this same idea concerning Credit Cards but yet they want people to be in Debt and have to pay all of that interest.

    Oh... the US Dollar is also a note of DEBT and effectively a credit card for the US Government who like a credit card holder is in DEBT.

    So obviously the Banks collecting interest which in many cultures in the past was ILLEGAL and called USURY. So according to the old laws the Bankers would be criminals.

    ReplyDelete
  3. " A full 80 percent of the general population believes that it is not acceptable for a borrower to stop paying his or her mortgage, even under conditions of financial distress."
    - i bet that number drops like a stone for the states around the gulf!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Personal responsibility is the bedrock of our system.Caveat emptor: Let the buyer beware... Let the buyer always be suspicious.

    The system broke down and bankers became culpable when they quit holding an interest in the paper. They became "gold toothed used car salesmen" when they packaged up the paper and said good bye to the quality of the underwriting.

    Sanity begins to return when every loan made results in the orginator retaining some % of liability.

    Ultimately the individuals have to be held the most responsible but the system needs to return to a point when it was not incentivized to have the bankers trying to trick them.

    At this point the bankers are responsible for their fraud.

    Again the fix is to tell borrowers we will fix the system by removing the inclination for fraud that was pushed into the system by do gooder politicians directing Fannie and Freddie to cheat via homeowner programs and the Federal reserves easy money. BUT BORROWER NO ONE, I MEAN NO ONE WILL LOOK OUT FOR YOU BETTER THAN YOU WILL! PERIOD!

    ReplyDelete
  5. People that take loans out for more than they can logically repay do not have a legitimate excuse when they default, period. You got to live in the house, the taxpayers and those that pay their mortgages did not!

    You have the right to pursue happiness, but there are no guarantees. To expect a bailout for risk of bad choice is just wrong. Nobody held a gun to their heads forcing them to sign, professional or otherwise. If you are not smart enough to take out a loan then do not undertake unless you seek out professional advice from someone looking out for you. You would not go to court AS THE DEFENDANT taking counsel FROM THE PROSECUTOR. Crying foul now is dishonest.

    It was greed or stupidity driving these people. They do the same thing with cars, big screens, useless bling, weekly lotto tickets.

    Gut up and move on sheep.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very well done article and 100% true. Everyone dumps on the borrower for being irresponsible or careless, but the banks themselves should accept the blame for writing careless loans.

    The 'Liar loans' of 2002-2006 being the worse. Where borrowers were encouraged to lie about their employment and income and banks did no research before granting loans.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Its called build up great credit. Then take all available credit and personal cash. Liquidate all assets and cashout. Skip the country for three years. Its a civil jugdement against u in court but the bankerds get fucked by u and laughed at by the judge. And u get to legally walk free with all the banks money

    ReplyDelete
  8. Tony Hayward calls the shots as BP's president about as much as B.O. our sock puppet calls the shots for our corporation.

    The decisions are made behind closed doors by the Board of Directors. The banking elite families.

    Presidents are just stage actors paid to give the sheep the false impression that they have a say in matters.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I work with the public and they are educated to max out at the sixth grade level. Yes, that is the true level that we dumb down to for newspapers and the other MSM. Is it no wonder they can't figure out how the bankers are fucking them over?
    Give it up. Nothing will ever change until they wake up and can't power up American Idol or their favorite football game.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The buck stops with someone wanting a bigger house than they can afford. And the democraps are the ones who either forced or allowed (makes no difference) banks to give the loans to people who could not pay, so blame the democraps or blame the people who bought the houses, but stop blaming the banks unless you can prosecute them under the current law at the time. Don't get me wrong, banks suck - no doubt, but the afore mentioned duet is still the real cause of this particular issue.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Regarding the site - you need to spend more of your reading time promoting your site and/or getting sponsors/advertisers. I appreciate your site and don't want to see it go away.

    ReplyDelete
  12. i love this site
    do to the massive attack

    that shows me thier listening
    but what is thier attack for why
    maaaaaaybe a controled collapse
    and sites like these are a direct assualt
    on the powers that be

    please keep moderating
    so we can tell it like it is

    thanks ea i hope you do well

    ReplyDelete
  13. Ah, screw that moral obligation to repay a mortgage. If the deal sucks, do what companies do EVERYDAY. Walk away. 80% thinks its immoral to stop paying a loan, but why dont they say the same about the big companies that do it? Screw the banks and leave.

    ReplyDelete
  14. All Americans should just default on their mortgages, credit cards and loans. Screw the banks!

    ReplyDelete

Everyone is encouraged to participate with civilized comments.