Thursday, June 24, 2010

Obama to make $85 million from BP disaster?

“Goldman Sachs wasn’t alone either in its astute “foreknowledge” of the collapse of BP’s stock value due to the Gulf disaster as BP’s own chief executive, Tony Hayward, sold about one-third of his shares weeks before this catastrophe began unfolding too.
But according to this FSB report the largest seller of BP stock in the weeks before this disaster occurred was the American investment company known as Vanguard who through two of their financial arms (Vanguard Windsor II Investor and Vanguard Windsor Investor) unloaded over 1.5 million shares of BP stock saving their investors hundreds of millions of dollars, chief among them President Obama.
For though little known by the American people, their President Obama holds all of his wealth in just two Vanguard funds, Vanguard 500 Index Fund where he has 3 accounts and the Vanguard FTSE Social Index Fund where he holds another 3 accounts, all six of which the FSB estimates will earn Obama nearly $8.5 million a year and which over 10 years will equal the staggering sum of $85 million.
The FSB further estimates in this report that through Obama’s 3 accounts in the Vanguard 500 Index Fund he stands to make another $100 million over the next 10 years as their largest stock holding is in the energy giant Exxon Mobil they believe will eventually acquire BP and all of their assets for what will be essentially a “rock bottom” price and which very predictably BP has hired Goldman Sachs to advise them on.
Important to note is that none of this wealth Obama, Goldman Sachs, and other American elites is acquiring would be possible without this disaster, all of whom, as the evidence shows, “somehow” knew what was going to happen before it actually did, including the US energy giant Halliburton who 2 weeks prior to this disaster just happened to purchase the World’s largest oil disaster service company Boots & Coots”.

11 comments:

  1. So do you really think he had prior knowledge????? I am sorry it makes no sense

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's a pretty far reach, and probably speculative BS

    ReplyDelete
  3. This will get smothered by the far right, and in one ear and out the other with everyone else. This thing is as stretchy as a rubber band.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think the fact Obama's cabinet is loaded with Goldman Sachs people is enough. Also I forget who but one of those Goldman Sachs people required setting aside a conflict of interest law for them to take the position Obama offered.

    ReplyDelete
  5. So the next question is where did Obozo get the cash to drop into this fund?

    He has never has a real job.

    His books did not make him a boatload of money.

    Something's really wrong with this picture.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Gay men tend to help each other out financially.

    It's all a big club of happy partying gay men

    ReplyDelete
  7. is any one surprised

    all you see is corruption in goverment
    they cant even pass uenployement extensions

    obama new and got rich

    ReplyDelete
  8. People wake up!! This was a set up! Of course these satanic snakes knew!! Use common sense!! If a man bought a insurance policy for his wife for a couple of mil.. Then his wife ends up dead 3 weeks later.. Who do you think the police will talk to first? Smells like a criminal conspiracy to me! The subject would be charged on that alone!! All the Feds have to do is launch a RICO Investigation!! That alone would shut down BP and all of their assets would be frozen!! OBAMA AND ALL OF THE GOVERMENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS A FCKN DISGRACE!! They will be judged by the Almighty in the after life!! They can have all the money they want! They will not live forever believe that!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Not a big fan of the man but this is quite a stretch of a statement! It is an index fund you know, and if he were to earn 8.5m per year, even at 10%, would have to be worth 85M today. This fund is available to every Tom, Dick, and Harry - get real now.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 4:28 are you in the fund? Did you know about the fund? Are you privy to details, we, the public know NOTHING about? Are you an INSIDER? Work for Goldman Sachs? NO. When your money compounds the interest accumulated adds to the initial amount, making it, well, larger!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes, this is reposted from the ‘Conspiracy Theorist” Sisters of Sorcha Faal website and like all their conspiracy stories needs to be taken with a grain of salt. But, because of their own "strange" world views they often reprint important news that is of interest to them, World news that may be ignored by the MSM because of their own ‘Elite” world views But, their stories are often worth reading too. Personally ,I find their daily world news roundup section ,of great interest as a source of world news.
    http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1380.htm
    I first read of the dangers and chemical nature of the toxic dispersants BP has insisted in using , on this conspiracy website some time ago for example.
    Their wild “ extreme” appearing but timely story of that time, May 20th on dispersants , proved to have a basis in scientific fact.
    “The dispersal agent Corexit 9500 is a solvent originally developed by Exxon and now manufactured by the Nalco Holding Company of Naperville, Illinois that is four times more toxic than oil (oil is toxic at 11 ppm (parts per million), Corexit 9500 at only 2.61ppm). In a report written by Anita George-Ares and James R. Clark for Exxon Biomedical Sciences, Inc. titled “Acute Aquatic Toxicity of Three Corexit Products: An Overview” Corexit 9500 was found to be one of the most toxic dispersal agents ever developed. Even worse, according to this report, with higher water temperatures, like those now occurring in the Gulf of Mexico, its toxicity grows The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in discovering BP’s use of this dangerous dispersal agent ordered BP to stop using it, but BP refused stating that their only alternative to Corexit 9500 was an even more dangerous dispersal agent known as Sea Brat 4. The main differences between Corexit 9500 and Sea Brat 4 lie in how long these dangerous chemicals take to degrade into their constituent organic compounds, which for Corexit 9500 is 28 days. Sea Brat 4, on the other hand, degrades into an organic chemical called Nonylphenol that is toxic to aquatic life and can persist in the environment for years. A greater danger involving Corexit 9500, and as outlined by Russian scientists in this report, is that with its 2.61ppm toxicity level, and when combined with the heating Gulf of Mexico waters, its molecules will be able to “phase transition” from their present liquid to a gaseous state allowing them to be absorbed into clouds and allowing their release as “toxic rain” upon all of Eastern North America. Even worse, should a Katrina like tropical hurricane form in the Gulf of Mexico while tens of millions of gallons of Corexit 9500 are sitting on, or near, its surface the resulting “toxic rain..” Source’
    http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1374.htm

    ReplyDelete

Everyone is encouraged to participate with civilized comments.