Monday, October 4, 2010

Is The Green Agenda About Getting Rid Of As Many Humans As Possible?

Most people tend to think of environmentalists as warm, cuddly hippies that just want all of us to love one another and to do what is right for the environment.  And in fact, there are a few people out there who are actually like that.  However, the people at the very heart of the green agenda are a quite different breed.  The truth is that there are a growing number of environmental activists (including some very, very famous people) who are publicly advocating the end of our freedoms, the establishment of a Big Brother style world government and the systematic eradication of at least 90% of humanity all for the good of the environment.  Unfortunately, this is not a joke and it is not an exaggeration.  As you will see below, these people are very, very serious.  To these eco-fascists, climate change is the number one threat to the earth, and in order to eliminate that threat "democracy must be put on hold", an authoritarian world government must be established and we need to start getting rid of as many humans as possible.
More Here..

Jim Rogers: Gold To $2000 Silver Is A Bargain
The huge rally in gold is expected to continue—with $2,000 an ounce well within sight over the next decade, well-known commodities investor Jim Rogers told CNBC 


  1. "Is The Green Agenda About Getting Rid Of As Many Humans As Possible?"


    "It's for the earth"

  2. "Is The Green Agenda About Getting Rid Of As Many Humans As Possible?"


    "It's for the earth"

    In that case, eradicate ALL humans. But, then...what is the earth's purpose? Just to exist without the 1% C02 humans contribute to the sum total? Heck, why not just nuke the entire planet and make it similar to Mars? The earth can then be just another "rock" orbiting the sun no better or worse than the rest. It's us "humans" that make this planet unique in the universe (as far as we know) you eco-fascist dumbasses!

  3. This is more dreamt up illogical idiocy coming in from the right fringe. There are very few truly environmentally conscious people, greens included, who want big government and taking away freedoms. Its just silly. Meanwhile, these conspiracy folk on the far fringes of the right cry every time someone mentions the fact that the population is too large and we are raping the earth left and right. Duh, can it not be any more plainly obvious? The perpetual motion machines wont save us from peak oil, famine, and eco-disasters. Of course big business is to blame in all this as much as people who think its their god given right to consume as much as they possibily can in order to call themselves happy and successful. Guys, wake up, smell the coffee, and slap your silly selves in the face. It's time for a reality check. Stop crying about socialism. That is not where we are heading. You would do better to worry about fascism and trying to avoid the return of (overt) feudalism.

  4. Any eco-nazi or Malthusian human population cull types sticking like Gore to the convenient truths of story telling for protecting profits and licencing carbon taxes ,as a cover for increasing taxes on the worlds people, is increasingly now recognized as being a science denier.
    The recent “climategate” scandals have the liars on the run.
    Cooking the books ,cherry picking the data to support theories,or running garbage in –garbage out computer modeling programs for getting desired results for hockey stick graphs , is not science. Only a Gore or a polar bear hit on the head with a hockey stick would believe that kind of science.

    As usual official science in the US ,The US academy of Science is behind the times in seeking truth from facts and sticking to story telling . (The three bears story comes next after the polar bear with sunburn at the north pole story )

    So even The Royal Society of Great Britain has been forced to shamefacedly rewrite its stories to join the camp of the “Skeptics” somewhat . Backtracking as well as it can in a well mannered gentlemanly English way of protecting the guilty and not apologizing but still running cover for its past support for all manner of nonsense opinion as science in the past. But The new trend back to science is now set!
    The big , big, stick in the past was to claim the science was “already settled” ,that global warming fact and trend was all clearly scientific fact and any person raising questions was a science denier.
    The boot is now on the other foot with the “Scotish” verdict.
    Case not proved!
    The new guide says:
    ''The size of future temperature increases and other aspects of temperature, and other aspects of climate change, especially at the regional scale, are still subject to uncertainty."

  5. Hey,

    Do you know that we really did NOT put a man on the moon?

    It was all done in a californication studio !


Everyone is encouraged to participate with civilized comments.