Those who make their living celebrating the lives of the rich were clearly delighted last month by the charity pledge from Bill Gates and Warren Buffet, since it showed what great guys billionaires really are.
So it wasn't surprising that Robert Frank, chronicler of the rich for the Wall Street Journal, took offense this week when we wrote a piece debunking the virtues of philanthropy.
Our piece was actually an excerpt from our new book, The Trouble with Billionaires, and philanthropy is just one of our targets.
Our piece was actually an excerpt from our new book, The Trouble with Billionaires, and philanthropy is just one of our targets.
Some billionaires, such as Leo J. Hindery Jr., have made this point themselves. Hindery, whose contribution was to found a cable television sports network, put it this way: "I think there are people, including myself at certain times in my career, who because of their uniqueness warrant whatever the market will bear." Similarly, Sanford Weill, long a towering figure on Wall Street, is impressed with the contributions of billionaires like himself: "People can look at the last 25 years and say that this is an incredibly unique period of time. We didn't rely on somebody else to build what we built..." Read more and watch the video.........
It is absurd to tie the existence of billionaires with infant mortality. Our infant mortality rate is slightly higer then other countries almost entirely because of drug and chemical abuse and certainly not because of a few billionaires. Additionally many countries count infant mortality in different and sometimes bizarre ways designed to undercount their own infant mortality rates.
ReplyDelete